Webb v. Imperial Life Insurance
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
Two questions are presented by this appeal: (1) Did the plaintiff have an insurable interest in the life of the insured? (2) Was there error in the charge of the court relative to intoxicating liquor ?
1. It was admitted that the plaintiff and the insured were brothers, and that the defendant executed and delivered the policy to the plaintiff wbo paid tbe premiums thereon. It was also in evidence, uncontra-dicted, that the insured was married and had children, that the relation between the brothers was cordial and brotherly, and that the plaintiff had aided in the support of the insured during…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Equitable Life Insurance v. HazlewoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. FranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Goodwin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Rogers v. Atlantic Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cook v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Ludlow v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Mutual Savings Life Insurance Company v. NoahSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Heltsley v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
- Life Casualty Ins. of Tennessee v. CrawfordAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.