Legal Opinion
Ludlow v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided July 2, 1948PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaptist, J.
The bill was filed by the complainant, Louise L. Ludlow, beneficiary under a policy issued to her deceased husband Prank Ludlow, by the defendant, Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee.
The deceased was accidentally lulled in an automobile wreck while the policy was in force.
The policy is denominated on the face as an “Industrial Travel and Pedestrian Policy.”
The weekly premium was five cents and accidental death benefit was in the amount of $1000.00, for which amount the suit is brought.
The question arises upon the following provision of the policy:
“This policy does not cover . . .…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Accident Insurance v. CrandalSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Royal Insurance v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hawkeye Commercial Men's Ass'n v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Moore v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Domínguez Vargas v. Great American Life Assurance Co. of Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Interstate Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. GammonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
- Brown v. J.C. Penney Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Life Casualty Ins. of Tennessee v. CrawfordAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Hattley v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.