Pearce v. Boggs
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lake County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
Action of claim and delivery. The plaintiff purchased two mares from L. G. Simmons, at Lakeport, on the 1st of April, 1891, and took from him a bill of sale and an order upon one Reynolds for their delivery. The mares were at that time at pasture on a ranch belonging to Reynolds, about thirty miles from Lakeport, where they had been placed about a month previously by one Christie. Christie had been working the mares during the winter for their feed under an agreement with Simmons, and at the close of the working season placed them on this ranch with the consent of Simmons, and told the keeper…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Etchepare v. AguirreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Williams v. LerchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Guthrie v. CarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LP, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Schance v. H. O. Adams Tile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hanson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Bevis v. Terrace View Partners, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.