Legal Opinion
In re Ganaposki
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 3, 1939No. 9801PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a petition to review the report of the referee to whom the answer of William Ganaposki, alleged bankrupt, was referred. The petition alleges that the referee erred in concluding 'that William Ganaposki was a partner in the Pittston Tire Company, and consequently could be adjudicated a bankrupt on the petition of creditors of the company.
The facts in the casé, briefly stated, are as follows:
An involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed on June 15, 1938, against William Ganaposki, and Louis C. Ganaposki, trading as the Pittston Tire Company. On June 30, 1938,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fahey v. SapioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
- Kaplan v. DrevenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
- Buffalo Milling Co. v. Lewisburg Dairy Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1908
- In re KuntzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- Rudolph v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Henderson v. Buchanan (In Re Western World Funding, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Leprino Foods Co. v. Gress Poultry, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Lewis v. Maloon (In Re Lewis)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- In Re Verses IUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- McClyman v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950