Buffalo Milling Co. v. Lewisburg Dairy Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHBALD, District Judge.
It is denied by W. II. Coldren, the respondent, that he ever was a partner in the Eewisburg Dairy Company as charged, on the strength of which, also, he asserts his solvency and demands a jury trial. A partnership in fact, must of course, be shown. In re Beckwith & Co., 12 Am. Bankr. Rep. 453, 130‘Fed. 475. But the evidence on the part of the petitioners, while disputed, is sufficient to establish it, if believed; and if the case was to rest here I should be compelled to find in their favor. But, if the respondent was a partner, it is admittedly decisive of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schloss v. StrellowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re GanaposkiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- In re KuntzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
- In re PinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1910