Legal Opinion

Buffalo Milling Co. v. Lewisburg Dairy Co.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 21, 1908No. 975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

It is denied by W. II. Coldren, the respondent, that he ever was a partner in the Eewisburg Dairy Company as charged, on the strength of which, also, he asserts his solvency and demands a jury trial. A partnership in fact, must of course, be shown. In re Beckwith & Co., 12 Am. Bankr. Rep. 453, 130‘Fed. 475. But the evidence on the part of the petitioners, while disputed, is sufficient to establish it, if believed; and if the case was to rest here I should be compelled to find in their favor. But, if the respondent was a partner, it is admittedly decisive of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schloss v. StrellowCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re GanaposkiDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  2. In re KuntzDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. In re PinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API