Legal Opinion

Southern California Edison Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 23, 2011No. 2010-5147PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

In this, another of the spent nuclear fuels cases, the United States (“Government”) had contracted to dispose of plaintiffs spent nuclear fuel and related wastes; as in the other cases, the contract continues to be breached because the United States has yet to perform. The only issue before us is the measure of damages, specifically, whether certain indirect overhead costs incurred by plaintiff can be included in plaintiffs damages calculations. The United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Federal Claims”) concluded that such indirect costs are includable. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Denis E. Dehne v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Whitney Benefits, Inc. And Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Southern California Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boston Edison Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. System Fuels, Inc. and Entergy Arkansas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Energy Northwest v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Stockton East Water District and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
  5. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API