Legal Opinion
Brookins v. Indianapolis Power & Light Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided April 10, 2000No. IP 98-0568-C-T/GPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENTRY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS FOLLOWING TRIAL
TINDER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Derek Lamont Brookins, claims that Defendant, Indianapolis Power & Light Company (“IPL”), failed to provide a reasonable accommodation of his disability of depression and/or anxiety, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101, el seq. 1 Trial was held and the court received testimony in person as well as documentary exhibits. These findings are based on the preponderance of the evidence. 2
I. Facts Established at Trial
From 1989 through March 26, 1997, Mr. Brookins was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mary M. Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Incorporated of California, T/a Kee Business College Campus National Education Centers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Lori L. Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration, James R. Klauser, Lee MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Peter H. Bombard v. Fort Wayne Newspapers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Vincent J. Krocka, Cross-Appellee v. City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Stephanie Waggoner v. Olin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Corujo-Marti v. Triple-S, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2007
- Green v. Medco Health Solutions of Texas, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2013
- Rednour v. Wayne TownshipDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.