Legal Opinion
Tollin v. DIAMOND STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided September 8, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
164 A.2d 254 (1960)
Blanche TOLLIN, Albert Tollin, Frances Tollin Freezman and Shirley Ingram, surviving partners doing business as Delaware Sports Service, Plaintiffs,
v.
DIAMOND STATE TELEPHONE COMPANY, a corporation of the State of Delaware, Defendant, and
State of Delaware, Defendant-Intervenor.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
September 8, 1960.
Henry A. Wise, Jr., Wilmington, for plaintiffs.
William S. Potter and Hugh Corroon of Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, for defendant, Diamond State Tel. Co.
Januar D. Bove, Atty. Gen., of the State of Delaware, pro se, defendant-intervenor.
MA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- In Re HandySupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Pennsylvania Publications, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Pike v. Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Smith v. Highway BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pottock v. Continental Can Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1965