Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Hotel Bond Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 27, 1933PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant operates a hotel and dining room, that it served the plaintiff with food in its dining room which it impliedly warranted to be wholesome and fit for human consumption, that in fact the food was not wholesome and the plaintiff became ill as a result of eating it. The defendant demurred to the complaint upon the ground, in substance, that the furnishing of food to the plaintiff did not involve a sale of the food, and that there was no implied warranty by the defendant that it was fit for human consumption. The court sustained the demurrer, and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Burkhardt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  2. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Race v. . KrumNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Cliett v. Lauderdale Biltmore CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
  3. Epstein v. GiannattasioConnecticut Superior Court · 1963
  4. Albrecht v. RubinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Colonna v. Rosedale Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API