Bersie v. Zycad Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentLansing, Judge
The record compels a finding that Jane Bersie was subjected to sexual harassment in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act. As a woman, Bersie was clearly a member of a class protected by the Act. Minn.Stat. § 363.03, subd. l(2)(c) (1982). Moreover, despite the opinion’s weak characterization of the facts, the record conclusively indicates that Bersie was subject to sexual harassment. Accordingly, the trial court’s judgment should be reversed and the case should be remanded for a new trial.
Sexual harassment includes
*293unwelcome * * * sexually motivated physical contact or other verbal or…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dr. N. Jay ROGERS Et Al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Katz v. DoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Danz v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Continental Can Co. Ex Rel. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.