Myers v. . Barnhardt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stact, 0. J.
Tbe practice of suspending judgments in criminal prosecutions, upon terms that are reasonable and just, or staying executions therein for a time, with the consent of the defendant, has so long-prevailed in our courts of general jurisdiction that it may now be considered established, both by custom and judicial decision, as a part of the permissible procedure in such cases. S. v. Edwards, 192 N. C., 321, 135 S. E., 37; S. v. Everitt, 164 N. C., 399, 79 S. E., 274; S. v. Hilton, 151 N. C., 687, 65 S. E., 1011.
It has been held that a court “may suspend judgment upon the understanding…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- State v. EverittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . HiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Moloney v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- State v. . WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. . PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. PelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. SimmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- State v. BransonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.