Legal Opinion

Snowden v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal as upon Writ of Error, from tLe Circuit Court for Harford County.

1Opinion of the CourtMcSiiebby, J.

The appellant was indicted by the grand jury of Harford County for selling fertilizers without having procured the license prescribed by the Act of Assembly of eighteen hundred and eighty-two, chapter four hundred and fifty-one. He demurred to the indictment, and upon the demurrer being overruled, ho pleaded not guilty, was put upon trial, was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine. Whether the Circuit Court was correct in its ruling on the demurrer is the question presented for review by the writ of error, Tinder which the case has been brought into this Court.

The Act of eighteen hundred and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Higgins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
  2. State v. BowersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Board of County School Commissioners v. HenkelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  2. Wachter v. McEvoyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  3. Thomas v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  4. McCracken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  5. Mayor of Salisbury v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API