Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Field

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 16, 1923PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The Ordinance of Estimates of the Mayor and City Council of Baltimore for the year 1922 contains the following provision: “Allowance of fund to- the Board of School Commissioners to be used in their discretion solely for the purpose of equalizing salaries of secondary teachers, on the basis of equal pay for equal work without distinction as to sex or color.” The Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City, which will be hereafter referred to as the School Board, declined to apply the fund thus appropriated to the purpose indicated in the ordinance, or to expend it at all. Thereupon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Garitee v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  2. Mayor of Cumberland v. MagruderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  3. County Commissioners v. Commissioners of LaurelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1879
  4. Hummelshime v. HirschCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Miles v. BradfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Center, LLC v. Lexington Charles Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  2. Baltimore Retail Liquor Package Stores Ass'n v. Board of License CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Board of Education v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  4. Durkee v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
  5. Graham v. JoyceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API