Platt v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearns,
This is an appeal from a judgment entered for defendant non obstante veredicto in a suit by a beneficiary against an insurance company on its policy which insured, the life of plaintiff’s husband. Judgment was entered for defendant because the uncontradicted documentary evidence established false and fraudulent statements made by the insured in the insurance application, upon which the insurer relied in issuing the policy.
The policy was issued on April 24, 1943. Insured died within three months thereafter on July 3, 1943. The cause of death was “a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Prevete v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Derr v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DiGiacomoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. SevilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Fauceglia v. HarrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Williams v. McClainSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.