Legal Opinion · Dissent

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. White

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 1986No. 4316; CA A38728Published

1DissentWarren, J.

I disagree with the majority and, therefore, dissent.

Numerous state courts have been confronted with the task of interpreting statutes which apply to individuals of a designated age “or younger.” In Knott v. Rawlings, 250 Iowa 892, 96 NW2d 900 (1959), the defendant was charged with committing lascivious acts with a child who was sixteen years, six months and three days old. The relevant statute prohibited such acts in the presence or with the body “of a child of the age of sixteen years, or under.” Knott v. Rawlings, supra, 96 NW2d at 900. In response to the argument that a child who is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. McGahaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Knott v. RawlingsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Berry Transport, Inc. v. HeltzelOregon Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API