Legal Opinion
PERRONE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 29, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00923Unknown
1Opinion
*NOT FOR PUBLICATION* UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ____________________________________ : MICHAEL PERRONE, TOM TARANTINO, : and ROCHELLE ROSEN : : Civil Action No.: 19-00923 (FLW) Plaintiff, : : OPINION vs. : : JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________ : WOLFSON, Chief Judge: Presently before the Court is a motion by defendants Johnson & Johnson (“J&J” or the “Company”), Peter Fasolo (“Fasolo”), and Dominic Caruso (“Caruso”) (collectively, “Defendants”), to dismiss Plaintiffs Michael Perrone, Tom Tarantino, and Rochelle Rosen…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.