Legal Opinion

Betta v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeals, 130 and 145PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Ladner,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to enter judgment n.o.v.

L. W. Smith was the fee simple owner of 1100 acres of land in Jay Township, Elk County, known as Warrant No. 4895. He leased the coal underneath to the plaintiff at a royalty of ten cents a ton. Contiguous to Smith’s warrant was land of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, known as Warrant No. 5283. Plaintiff drove his heading beyond Smith’s land into the land of the Commonwealth, having been told by Smith that he, plaintiff, might remove the coal beneath the Commonwealth’s warrant as he,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kunkel v. KunkelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. McKibben v. DoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  3. Potter v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wilson Area School District v. SkeptonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Youngstown Mines Corp. v. ProutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Acme Markets, Inc. v. Valley View Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. GAF CORPORATION v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. Collingdale Millwork Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API