Legal Opinion

Gupta v. Freixenet, USA, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 11, 1995No. 95 C 1161PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge:

This case focuses on a dispute about disability benefits. Before the court are two motions: (1) Plaintiff David Gupta’s (“Gupta”) Motion to Remand and (2) Defendant Freixenet, USA, Inc.’s (“Freixenet”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. For the following reasons, the motion to remand is denied and the motion to dismiss is granted as to Counts I and III with prejudice. Count II is dismissed without prejudice and leave to file an amended complaint on or before January 2, 1996.

I. Background

Gupta filed this action alleging a mis-calcu-lation of his…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Venture Associates Corporation, a Tennessee Corporation v. Zenith Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Emil J. Bartholet v. Reishauer A.G. (Zurich) and Reishauer Corporation (Elgin)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blum v. Spectrum Restaurant Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2003
  2. Potter v. ICI Americas, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Reber v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  4. Fiene v. v. & J FOODS, INC.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Silva v. Fortis Benefits InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API