Legal Opinion

Silva v. Fortis Benefits Insurance

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided July 12, 2006No. 05 C 3340PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JEFFREY COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF THE LITIGATION

Union Security Insurance Company (“USIC”), formerly known as Fortis Benefits Insurance Company (“Fortis”), moves for a protective order pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, precluding plaintiffs discovery requests for the production of documents, interrogatories, request for admission of facts and genuineness of documents, and notice of deposition of Tracie Hoffman (“the Discovery Requests”). For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted.

Plainti…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Molina v. First Line Solutions LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
  2. Miller v. Ameritech Long Term Disability PlanDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2008
  3. Cotter v. Prudential FinancialDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API