Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 10, 1993No. 2-91-322-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Frank Earl Thomas was indicted for the offense of robbery, a second degree felony under Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 29.02 (Vernon 1989). As an enhancement count, the indictment also alleged one previous felony conviction for robbery. On September 12, 1991, the jury found Thomas guilty of the primary robbery offense charged. At the punishment phase of the trial, Thomas pled “true” to the enhancement allegation and the jury assessed punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for eighty years.

We affirm.

In his first point…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Uribe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Skillern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  2. Schneider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Gilbert Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  4. Gilbert Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002
  5. Gilbert Salinas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API