Legal Opinion

Schneider v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 30, 1999No. 2-98-333-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Introduction

In this case we consider whether appellant Scott Paul Schneider waived his right to appeal. Because we conclude that appellant did in fact voluntarily and knowingly waive this right, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. We therefore do not address appellant’s eight points alleging various instances of reversible error.

Factual Background

At trial, a jury found appellant guilty of aggravated assault. Before the punishment phase of the trial began, appellant entered into a plea agreement in which he waived both his right to have the jury set…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Erdman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Hankins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Ex Parte TaborCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Acosta v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Monreal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. Buck v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2001
  3. Tate v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  4. Jeffrey Rawson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
  5. Jeffrey Rawson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API