Legal Opinion

Rehn v. Bingaman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1950No. 32592PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

The question here involved arises on a motion to recall the mandate of this court for the purpose of securing a modification of the judgment awarding costs, and on two motions to retax the costs incurred in this court.

The record shows that plaintiff obtained a money judgment against the defendant Arthur Bingaman, administrator of the estate of Alvin A. Bingaman, deceased, in the district court for Douglas County. John P. Mainelli was made a party defendant in that action for the sole purpose of protecting his subrogation rights under section 48-118, R. S. 1943. The administrator appealed.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rehn v. BingamanNebraska Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Bank v. MackleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Allen v. TallonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Smith v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. First Nat. Bank v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Ben Sterkel v. Fruehauf Corporation Ace Hardware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  3. O'Brien v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. BeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  5. American Province of the Servants of Mary Real Estate Corp. v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API