Legal Opinion

Pinkston v. Pinkston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1954No. 3159PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is a suit to set aside an order of the Probate Court approving an $18,300 claim allowed by Will E. Pinkston as Administrator of his father’s estate, in favor of Will E. Pinkston as Executor of his mother’s estate.

L. A. Pinkston died in 1926 and by will provided that the oldest of his sons, Nat, Tom, Will E., and Lucian, should be Executor of his estate. Nat qualified as Executor and served until his death in 1947. Tom then qualified and served until his death in 1948. At Tom’s death Will E. Appellant herein, qualified as Administrator and is now serving as such.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Price v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  2. Ramey v. CageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Pinkston v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Huey v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Kerens National Bank v. StocktonTexas Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Monk v. Dallas Brake & Clutch Service Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  2. Warrantech Corp. v. Computer Adapters Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Zapata v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Pinkston v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Pinkston v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API