Pinkston v. Pinkston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TIREY, Justice.
This action involves a probate matter and the appeal is from an order of the district court refusing to approve a final account. At the conclusion of the testimony the court overruled written motion for instructed verdict. The issues submitted by the court, absent the burden of proof clause, are substantially:(1) Do you find that W. E. Pink-ston has been guilty of wilful default or gross negligence in the management of said estate, resulting in los9 to it? Answer: Yes.
(2, 7, 9 and 11) Do you find that W. E. Pinkston in his capacity as Administrator of the Estate of L. A.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- W. T. Huff. v. J. H. Huff, Admstr.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
- Richardson v. McCloskeyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Lanius v. FletcherTexas Supreme Court · 1907
- Cocke v. NaumannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Pinkston v. PinkstonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.