Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Cage

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1935No. 1458PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

A tract of 7,250 acres of land in Erath county was subject to a deed of trust lien in favor of Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank of Dallas to secure the sum of $40,000, evidenced by the note or bond of Day Cage. Subsequently a tract of 5,715 acres of the land was conveyed by Day Cage to J. C. Rucker, and by the latter to Brooke S. Ramey, John L. Ramey, Frank B. Ramey, C, Y. Early, and Elizabeth R. Early; a part of the consideration for each conveyance being the assumption by the grantees of $27,500 of the $40,000 obligation. There was an option permitting prepayment of the debt…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Sullivan v. DoyleTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hatton v. Bodan Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1909

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Fleetwood v. Med Center BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Lexington Insurance Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  3. Eastern States Petroleum Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1945
  4. Blanton v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Zapata v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API