Ford v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
RICHARDS, Justice.
Under rule 50, we have reconsidered our prior opinion upon the State Prosecuting Attorney’s petition for discretionary review. Tex.R.App. P. 50. We withdraw our opinion and judgment of June 11,1998 and substitute the following.
Chadrick S. Ford appeals from his convictions for murder and attempted murder. The sole issue presented is whether the trial court’s erroneous refusal of a jury shuffle should be disregarded as harmless error. Because our legislature has provided the parties in felony trials a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Williams v. Carolina Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Yanez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- North American Van Lines, Inc. v. Emmons, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2001
- Springs Window Fashions Division, Inc. v. Blind Maker, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
- American Interstate Insurance Co. v. Hinson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
- Dominguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
- Llamas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.