Legal Opinion
Reed v. Buckeye Fire Equipment Co.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided March 22, 2006No. Civ.A. 302CV205VPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, Chief Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, both filed September 30, 2004. On October 25, 2004, Plaintiff filed his Response to Defendants Motion’ for Summary Judgment. Defendants filed a Reply on November 12, 2004. This Motion is now ripe for disposition by the Court.
Having carefully considered the record, the arguments, and the applicable authority, for the below stated reasons the Court will grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Reed v. Buckeye Fire EquipmentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007