Pringle v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice.
In a trial before a jury, appellant was convicted of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated and sentenced to 30 days in jail, probated for 24 months, and a $500 fine. Appellant brings three points of error, contending that his conviction should be reversed because the court admitted into evidence testimony which was the fruit of an unlawful arrest, the information under which he was charged was not supported by sufficient affidavit, and the prosecutor improperly commented on appellant’s failure to testify. We find no reversible error, and appellant’s conviction is affirmed.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- De La Paz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- Richardson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.