Legal Opinion

Stoutenborough v. Board of Education

California Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1894No. 15446PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Belcher, C.

The plaintiffs commenced this action in March, 1876, to quiet their title to a lot of land in the city and county of San Francisco. In due time an answer and cross-complaint were filed, setting up the defendant’s ownership of the lot, and thereafter an answer to the cross-complaint was filed denying the defendant’s ownership, and setting up the statute of limitations.

On July 18, 1881, an order was entered by the clerk in the minutes of the court, which, after setting out the title of the court and cause, reads as follows:

“This cause was called on the general calendar this day, and,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lewis v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Kester v. McNearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Mitchell v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Burke v. W. R. Chamberlin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Shippy v. Peninsula Rapid Transit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API