Legal Opinion

Slocum v. Bear Valley Irrigation Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1898No. L. A. No. 305PublishedCited by 12 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order denying a new trial. John L. Campbell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an appeal by the receivers of the corporation defendant from a judgment declaring and enforcing certain asserted liens of plaintiffs upon the property of the corporation, and from an order denying a new trial. The liens are based upon the act of the legislature entitled, “An act to provide for the payment of the wages of mechanics and laborers employed by corporations,” approved May 31, 1891. (Stats. 1891, p. 195.) The act is quoted in full in former decisions of this court hereinafter referred to and need not be republished here.

It is contended by appellants that the act in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Keener v. Eagle Lake Land & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ackley v. Black Hawk Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ChadwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. HallnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Bedford Quarries Co. v. BoughIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  4. State v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Johnson v. Goodyear Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API