Legal Opinion

Ackley v. Black Hawk Gravel Mining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1896No. 18435PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sierra County. Stanley A. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to recover from the corporation defendant for work, labor, and services performed by plaintiff for said defendant, and to have the value thereof declared a lien upon the property of said defendant, under and pursuant to an act of the legislature of the state of California, approved March 31, 1891, entitled, “An act to provide for the payment of the wages of mechanics and laborers employed by corporations.” (Stats. 1891, p. 195.)

The other defendants are made parties, and averred to have, or claim to have, some interest in the property of the corporation, or lien…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Keener v. Eagle Lake Land & Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Goodyear Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Slocum v. Bear Valley Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Skinner v. Garnett Gold-Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
  4. Kuschel v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Spaulding v. Mammoth Spring Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API