Burnett v. Hoover Ball & Bearing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
Plaintiff’s two alleged causes of action were in substance as follows: First, that plaintiff was a distributor of defendant’s products under a written agreement, and defendant terminated the relationship without giving plaintiff sixty days ’ notice as required by the agreement, to plaintiff’s damage in the sum of $600 for loss of profits; and that defendant removed all of its consigned products from plaintiff’s place of business and thereby damaged plaintiff in the sum of $3,500, the reasonable value of his business. Second, that defendant did not give plaintiff credit for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Capital Bond & Investment Co. v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Jacobson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hickey v. RobyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Fearey v. GoughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Miller v. Santa Margarita Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ferrero v. FerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Ferrero v. FerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956