Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ferrero v. Ferrero

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1956No. Civ. 16957Published

1DissentDooling, J.

I dissent. The order appealed from purports to adjudicate title between the respondent, Aldo Perrero, and the beneficiaries of an insurance policy issued by Bankers Life Company on the life of the decedent. It determines that the proceeds belong to respondent and directs that they be applied toward the purchase price of decedent’s interest in the business.

The probate court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of this part of the order and the order to this extent is void. (Capital Bond etc. Co. v. Hood, 218 Cal. 729 [24 P.2d 765]; Rogers v. Cady, 104 Cal. 288 [38 P. 81, 43 Am. St.Rep.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In Re Estate of PuseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Central Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Andrews v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API