Legal Opinion

Thibeault v. Manchester Shoe Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 5, 1946No. 3555PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBurque, J.

The accident happened February 3, 1940, sometime

after 9:30 p. m. Plaintiff’s claim at the trial was that he fell on ice that had formed in the gutter on the east side of the street. In his deposition, taken a year before the trial, he claimed he fell on what he referred to as a sidewalk adjacent to defendants’ buildings, not being too specific as to whether it was in front of the building occupied by the Salvage company or building occupied by the Manchester company. His specific allegation is that the ice was formed as the result of steam or water, or both, coming out of an underground pipe…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wessman v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  2. Kingsbury v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  3. Brickell v. Boston & Maine Transportation Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1944
  4. Coleman v. StacySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MacFarlane v. MacKeanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API