Brickell v. Boston & Maine Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
Defendant’s motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict were properly denied. The case was sent to the jury upon the claims of the plaintiff that three statutes had been violated by the defendant: 1, the parking statute; 2, the statute relating to the use of flares when a truck is parked on the highway; 3, the statute requiring trucks to be equipped with reflectors.
It is sufficient to say at this point that the evidence justified a finding that the statute regarding the use of flares was not complied with. The statute reads as follows: “Every truck, bus, or tractor when operated outside the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cole v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
- Tufts v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hayungs v. FalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Appleyard Motor Transp. Co. v. Ray Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
- Eaton v. Bass Wooden v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
- Hackett v. PerronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Jodoin v. BaroodySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.