Legal Opinion

Brickell v. Boston & Maine Transportation Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 7, 1944No. 3461PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Defendant’s motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict were properly denied. The case was sent to the jury upon the claims of the plaintiff that three statutes had been violated by the defendant: 1, the parking statute; 2, the statute relating to the use of flares when a truck is parked on the highway; 3, the statute requiring trucks to be equipped with reflectors.

It is sufficient to say at this point that the evidence justified a finding that the statute regarding the use of flares was not complied with. The statute reads as follows: “Every truck, bus, or tractor when operated outside the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cole v. MorseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  2. Tufts v. WhiteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hayungs v. FalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Appleyard Motor Transp. Co. v. Ray Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  3. Eaton v. Bass Wooden v. Hoover Motor Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. Hackett v. PerronSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Jodoin v. BaroodySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API