Wessman v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
1. Although the plaintiff was riding upon a free pass, the relationship of passenger and carrier between her and the defendant was unaffected by that fact. A person riding upon a pass is as much a passenger as if he had paid full fare (2 Moore, Carriers, 2d ed. 975. Rogers v. Company, 86 Me. 261), and is entitled to all the care and protection which the carrier is bound to furnish to paying passengers. 2 Hutchinson, Carriers, (3d ed.), ss. 1021, 1022. Todd v. Railroad, 3 Allen 18, 21. See 10 C. J., Tit: Carriers, s. 1310, where the cases are collected. This relationship continued until she…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charleston & Western Carolina Railway Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Boering v. Chesapeake Beach Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Quimby v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Rogers v. Kennebec Steamboat Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1894
3Cited by8 opinions
- Barnes v. New Hampshire Karting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Technical Aid Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Papakalos v. ShakaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Morrow v. Auto Championship Racing Assn., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Shaer Shoe Corp. v. Granite State Alarm, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.