Legal Opinion
Harry Winston, Inc. v. Levin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1961No. 73PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YARRUT, Judge.
This suit was instituted as a sequestration of $98,273.68 of jewelry and diamonds, which plaintiff-appellee claims to have deposited with defendant Levin, since adjudicated a bankrupt, now represented by his receiver and trustee, who intervened for the bankrupt estate.
The District Court held plaintiff-appellee to be the owner, and intervenor (receiver and trustee) has taken this appeal. The record discloses the following facts:
Plaintiff is a Louisiana corporation, and is the subsidiary of Harry Winston, Inc., a New York corporation. The New York corporation is an importer,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- William Frantz & Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- Winru Chemical & Sales Co. v. CollierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- C. v. Hill & Co. v. Interstate Electric Co. of ShreveportLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bourg v. LopezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- William Frantz & Co. v. J. S. Winehill & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rocket Industries, Inc. v. Southern Tire & Supply, Inc. And Anthony PiazzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Travis v. HudnallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Spectrum Automotive Finishes, Inc. v. Westbank Body Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009