William Frantz & Co. v. J. S. Winehill & Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Action by William Frantz & Co. against J. S. Winehill & Co. and another. Judgment for plaintiffs was reversed by the Court of Appeal, and plaintiffs apply for certiorari or writ of review.
1Opinion of the CourtMonroe, J.
Plaintiff obtained judgment in the district court against defendants, in solido, for a diamond stud and a diamond heart, and, in default of delivery, for $810.94 (as the value of those articles), with interest.
Moss had made no defense and took no appeal. Winehill & Co. appealed, and the judgment, as to them, was reversed by the Court *681of Appeal. Plaintiffs are before this court praying for a review and reversal of the ruling last mentioned.
The facts, as disclosed by the record, are as follows:
The defendant Moss is a mechanic (jeweler, as we take it), who worked, at times, for plaintiff, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holton & Winn v. John A. Hubbard & Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1897
- Campbell v. NicholsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1845
- Perryman v. DemaretSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
- M'Burney v. FlaggSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1837
3Cited by7 opinions
- William Frantz & Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- In re Dreuil & Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1913
- Holloway v. A. J. Ingersoll Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Harry Winston, Inc. v. LevinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Hawkins v. CostleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.