Legal Opinion

Jones v. Jones

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 23, 2008No. AC 29354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

Our rules of practice provide that “[i]t is the responsibility of the appellant to provide an adequate record for review. The appellant shall determine whether the entire trial court record is complete, correct and otherwise perfected for presentation on appeal. For purposes of this section, the term ‘record’ is not limited to its meaning pursuant to Section 63-4 (a) (2), but includes all trial court decisions, documents and exhibits necessary and appropriate for appellate review of any claimed impropriety.” Practice Book § 61-10. “Where the factual or legal basis of the trial court’s…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency v. Landmark Investment Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Konefal v. KonefalConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Moreira v. MoreiraConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. SKD Construction Company LLC v. Maxi Drug IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API