Legal Opinion
Konefal v. Konefal
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 29, 2008No. AC 28253PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This disheartening case stems from an altercation between two elderly brothers. The defendant, Martin Konefal, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to open a judgment from a prior case and for dismissing his counterclaim asserted against the plaintiff, Joseph Konefal. We conclude that the defendant has failed to provide us with an adequate record to review his first claim and has briefed his second claim inadequately. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to the resolution of this case on appeal.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chase Manhattan Bank v. AECO Elevator Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Varley v. VarleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Legnos v. LegnosConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Shore v. Haverson Architecture & Design, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- New Haven Savings Bank v. MongilloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Baker v. Whitnum-BakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Brody v. BrodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Konefal v. KonefalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Magsig v. MagsigConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018