United States v. Reginald Clark

TATEL, Circuit Judge:

Challenging his conviction for bank and wire fraud, Appellant contends that the district court erroneously denied his Bat-*893son challenge and wrongly admitted certain evidence. Appellant also argues that the district court violated the Ex Post Facto Clause by calculating his sixty-three-month sentence on the basis of guidelines adopted subsequent to his crimes, applied an unwarranted aggravating role enhancement, and erred by basing his $200,000-plus restitution obligation in part on acquitted conduct. For the reasons set forth in this opinion,, we reject Appellant’s…