Legal Opinion

Caccitolo v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1975No. State 182PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

On February 12, 1974, following a trial to a jury, James J. Caceitolo was found guilty of intentionally intercepting a wire communication, in violation of secs. 968.31 (1) (a) 1 and 939.05 (l), 2 Stats. On March 15, 1974, the judgment of conviction was entered. Sentence was, however, withheld, and Caccitolo was placed on two years probation. Caccitolo’s motion to dismiss the information, or in the alternative for a new trial, was denied. Upon Caccitolo’s application, writs of error were issued to review the judgment of conviction and the order denying the motion to dismiss the information and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Pollack v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Burrows v. PaulsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Allison v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. AllesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Blue v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Holmes v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API