Moore Inv. Co. v. MICHELL, WILLIAMS, SELIG
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Terry Crabtree, Judge.
This is a legal-malpractice case. On October 20, 2003, the Pulaski County Circuit Court granted summary judgment in favor of the appellee, Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard, finding that no material issue of fact existed and that the three-year statute of limitations barred the claims made by the appellant, Moore’s Investment Company, in its complaint. The sole issue on appeal is whether summary judgment was appropriate. We hold that it was and affirm the trial court’s ruling.
The facts surrounding the limitation issue are as follows. Appellant engaged appellee…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Flentje v. First Nat. Bank of WynneSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- McCutchen v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Chapman v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Renfro v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Goldsby v. FairleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cleaves v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Cleaves v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Morrow Cash Heating & Air, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
- Morrow Cash Heating & Air, Inc. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006