Legal Opinion

Harres v. Leeke

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 24, 1984No. 22039Published

1Opinion of the Court

282 S.C. 131 (1984)

318 S.E.2d 360

William Thomas HARRES, Respondent,

v.

William D. LEEKE, and the South Carolina Department of Corrections, Appellants. Harry MOSES, Respondent,

v.

STATE of South Carolina, Appellant. Roger E. LANFORD, Respondent,

v.

STATE of South Carolina, Appellant.

22039

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

July 24, 1984.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Retired Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Atty. Gen. William K. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen. William G. Rhoden, Columbia, for appellants.

William E. Seekford, Towson, Md., and Robert Holland, Spartanburg, for respondents.

July 24, 1984.

LEWIS,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Harres v. LeekeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Whetsell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Griffin v. WARDEN, CCISupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API