Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 12, 1975No. 19962PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an appeal from a conviction of assault of a high and aggravated nature. The salient facts involved here are as follows:

Appellant was tried upon an indictment of assault and battery with intent to kill. During the course of the trial, the jury was excused from the courtroom in anticipation of appellant’s tender of a plea of guilty to simple assault and battery. In accordance with the principles enunciated in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. (2d) 274 (1969), the trial judge in order to determine whether the plea was voluntarily made with an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Parker v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. LambertSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API