Legal Opinion
Minh Q. Le v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 24, 2008No. 06-56804PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Minh Le (“Le”) first applied for Supplemental Social Security (“SSI”) benefits in September 1994, claiming an onset of disability of February 1994. His application was denied by an administrative law judge in October 1997, but that judgment was reversed by the district court and Le’s application was remanded to the Commissioner for additional proceedings. Le then moved in the district court for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). The district court denied the EAJA motion, concluding that the government’s position…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thomas FLORES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary, Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jeffrey Benton, on Behalf of Lynn Benton v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Joyce Lewis v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Gary H. Marolf, in Re Application for Return of Seized Property 1981 Mango Motor Sailboat Named "Asmara,"Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Ratto v. Secretary, Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Thouvenot, Wade & Moerschen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Kirk v. BerryhillDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
- Averbach v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Neydavoud v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Campos v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.