Legal Opinion
Neydavoud v. Astrue
District Court, C.D. California
Decided November 18, 2011No. Case No. CV 11-3714 JCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND
JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. SUMMARY
On April 29, 2011, plaintiff Behzad Neydavoud (“plaintiff’) filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of plaintiffs application for benefits. The parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, respectively (“Plaintiffs Motion”) and (“Defendant’s Motion”).1 The Court has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- (SS) Thompson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (SS) Thompson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Jacoby v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Saiz v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021