Legal Opinion

Campos v. Astrue

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 24, 2009No. CV 08-5648 JCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. SUMMARY

On September 8, 2008, plaintiff Graciela Campos (“plaintiff’) filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of plaintiffs applications for benefits. The parties have filed a consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment, respectively (“Plaintiffs Motion”) and (“Defendant’s Motion”). The Court has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78; L.R.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (SS) Castro v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Nolan v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Roberto Hernandez Perez v. Andrew SaulDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API