Legal Opinion

Valentin v. Ohio Edison

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 2012No. 11 MA 93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Valentin v. Edison,

2012-Ohio-2437.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT PABLO VALENTIN, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, ) ) V. ) CASE NO. 11 MA 93 ) OHIO EDISON, ) OPINION ) DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Civil Appeal from Youngstown Municipal Court of Mahoning County, Ohio Case No. 10CV103662Y JUDGMENT: Affirmed APPEARANCES: For Plaintiff-Appellant Atty. Raymond M. Delost 3685 Stutz Drive, Suite 100 Canfield, Ohio 44406 For Defendant-Appellee Atty. John T. Dellick 26 Market St., Suite 1200 P.O. Box 6077 Youngstown, Ohio 44501-6077 Atty.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kazmaier Supermarket, Inc. v. Toledo Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Illuminating Co. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. v. HensonOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Higgins v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Pacific Indemn. Co. v. DeemsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. State ex rel. Ohio Edison Co. v. Trumbull Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API