Legal Opinion

Morris v. Daiker, Admr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Plaintiff, Kate Morris, brought this action in the court of common pleas of Hamilton county, Ohio,

The action is in the nature of a creditor’s hill under favor of Section 11760, General Code.

The defendant Albert Daiker, as administrator, demurred to the petition, first on the ground that the petition did not set forth a cause of action against him; and, second, that there was a misjoinder of parties. The court overruled the demurrer, and exceptions were reserved.

The defendant Bruml, trustee, filed a motion to quash service on the ground that there is no joint interest between the defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. RaynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pack v. OsbornOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ternansky v. RabatinOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. McDonald v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Lloyd v. CampbellCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API